During the scoping process, what should be evaluated regarding scenarios?

Evaluating the potential for combining or separating scenarios during the scoping process is essential for several reasons. Scenarios are crafted to help organizations understand and analyze risk in various contexts. By examining whether scenarios can be combined or separated, practitioners can better define the boundaries of analysis and gain insights into how different threats might interact.

Combining scenarios may reveal compounded risks, where multiple factors could escalate the potential impact of a threat. Conversely, separating scenarios can help in isolating specific risks for more detailed study, allowing for clearer assessments and tailored response strategies. This flexibility in evaluating scenarios enhances the overall effectiveness of risk management processes.

Choosing to focus solely on successful scenarios, addressing biases, or imposing time limits on previous analyses could limit the scope and robustness of the risk assessment. It's essential to adopt a comprehensive and adaptable approach to scenario evaluation, which is exactly what considering the combination or separation of scenarios allows.